|
What Diana put online currently is just a preview of a work-in-progress
thing, not an 'icon set release', the Echo icon pack is just something
someone threw together to be able to get something of an impression of
how they look. The different icon sizes are generated from the same
.svg's because the smaller versions haven't been made yet You really shouldn't hurt your self, and look at work-in-progress work, if you can't judge and value it for what it is ... its like saying when the first brick of a new house is laid, 'thats not a good house, it doesn't have walls!'. Not very constructive criticism :-) Please if any of this is confusing to you, or makes you sad that things have to actually be 'made' before their 'done', then just wait until an official package is released Joachim Frieben wrote: When I look at the current "Echo" icon pack, I'd say that all three subdirectories "22x22", "24x24", "48x48" contain the same set of icons, albeit at different scales. This invalidates your argument, sorry ..These smaller icons are 'simplified' versions of their larger brothers and sisters since in so few pixels its very hard to convey so much graphical information, and as you pointed out, when you try to convey so much information in just a few pixels, it just becomes kind of a paint blob.. hence the column 'Small' at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/BluecurveAndBeyond/Gallery Not filled in yet, but i presume that this column will be filled-in in time with the smaller simplified versions of the icons, which don't turn into 'paint blobs' in 22x22 pixels.. even perspective might sometimes be 'flat' in the smaller icons to, as you point out, have max visual information room in such a small area._______________________________________________ Fedora-art-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ |
_______________________________________________ @xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/
