Le samedi 29 juillet 2006 à 01:31 -0400, Máirín Duffy a écrit : > Patrick W. Barnes wrote: > > There's still a popular perception that graffiti is associated with pop > > culture and is unprofessional. > > I've always seen RHEL as being 'professional' or 'enterprise-y' while > Fedora as more 'bleeding edge' and 'fun.' > > > It could be risky to use graffiti as part of > > the default theme in Fedora. > > What is the risk? > > Don't we already have enough sterile, 'enterprise-ready' artwork out > there? Perhaps Linux can grow from a painfully narrow demographic to a > much wider one with a bit more variety in the artwork? Maybe we could > try to push the edge by having a different theme/style each release? > > Just some food for thought. I'm not pushing for these to be default, but > at the same time, I *am* pretty sick of the same-old, same-old 'sterile' > graphic styles. +1 Do you know that I love you when you say this kind of thing ? :) > > For our last release, we had a bubble theme, which you could say is not > 'professional,' but was most definitely 'fun' and generated a lot of > excitement around the release. I kind of thought the point of Fedora was > to build a community operating system, not to cater to professional > types. There are plenty of other distros for that. > > Thanks, > ~m > > _______________________________________________ > > @xxxxxxxxxx > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ -- Thomas Canniot http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/ThomasCanniot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
_______________________________________________ @xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/
