Thanks. Basically, I should avoid creating such a large filesystems. On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Bodo Thiesen <bothie@xxxxxx> wrote: > * Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> hat geschrieben: > >> Mag Gam wrote: >>> We need to create very large filesystems. We prefer to have a >>> filesystem which is 12TB but it seems ext3 does not suppor that. >> Most recent ext3 kernelspace and userspace should technically >> make it to 16T. > > [...] > >> The downside is you probably can't mount it, because it's >> block size > page size on most architectures (like x86 and x86_64) > > Contradiction? Anyone? > > @Mag Gam: In other words: No, you can't, sorry. > > However, in dependence of what you *really* need, you could create two or > more file systems of lower size and mount some in places, where many files > are stored. Yes, I know, that this is sub-optimal - but better take a > sub-optimal solution than no solution ;) > > Regards, Bodo > > _______________________________________________ > Ext3-users mailing list > Ext3-users@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ext3-users > _______________________________________________ Ext3-users mailing list Ext3-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ext3-users