Mag Gam wrote: > While still on topic, is the compression patch e2compr in the mainline kernel? > nope -Eric > > On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Mag Gam wrote: >>> thanks for the response Eric. >>> >>> I am already setting the bytes per inode ratio :-) >> ... then you can set it lower, if you are still running out ... >> >>> I suppose we can wait for brtfs >> Well, if we are going to talk about other options, xfs is one as well, >> it also has dynamic inode allocation. That's better suited for another >> list though. :) >> >> -Eric >> >> >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> Mag Gam wrote: >>>>> I was curious if ext4 has dynamic inode allocation. Presently, the >>>>> application we run which resides on ext3; we constantly run out of >>>>> inodes because each file is about 2KB but there are millions of them. >>>> ext4 does not currently have dynamic inode allocation, though there has >>>> been some discussion of that. >>>> >>>> You can create your filesystem with more inodes from the start, though; >>>> -i bytes-per-inode (-i 2048) should be about right. >>>> >>>>> Also, is ext4 going to be a module or has to be compiled into the kernel? >>>> that depends on how you build your kernel, it's a config option. >>>> >>>> -Eric >>>> >> _______________________________________________ Ext3-users mailing list Ext3-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ext3-users
