Re: forced fsck (again?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Jan 22, 2008 7:35 PM, Bryan Kadzban <bryan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

(Actually, what about GPL versions?  It looks like e2fsprogs is still at
GPL version 2 -- that's OK with me, but do I need to say "v2 only", "v2
or later", or nothing specific?)
My suggestion is 'V2 or later', since that covers V2,  V3 (and, eventually, Vs 4, 5, 6 and 7).

--
Stephen Samuel http://www.bcgreen.com
778-861-7641
_______________________________________________
Ext3-users mailing list
Ext3-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ext3-users

[Index of Archives]         [Linux RAID]     [Kernel Development]     [Red Hat Install]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Postgresql]     [Fedora]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux