On Mon, 2006-04-10 17:28:18 +0200, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >deleted) or otherwise modified. So it's perfectly okay to delete such > >a container (eg. remove start and end from the partition table) and > >recreate it at some time later (by adding those values back to the > >partition table.) As long as the new container starts at the same > >location, a filesystem driver will be able to find the old > >information. If you start a block later, it won't find it's > >superblocks. > > > If using a filesystem with replicated superblocks (ext*, xfs), then ...? > [Includes expecting weird breakage.] I'll possibly test if this works in another life... MfG, JBG -- Jan-Benedict Glaw jbglaw@xxxxxxxxxx . +49-172-7608481 _ O _ "Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg _ _ O für einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger" | im Internet! | im Irak! O O O ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TCPA));
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Ext3-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ext3-users
