On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 04:58:57PM -0500, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote: > > I think we're probably at the right point to do so. Most people who are > most likely to be affected have a reasonably recent e2fsprogs now. On > the Fedora side I'm seeing very few reports of people bitten by > e2fsprogs incompatibility, and more and more instances of people bitten > the other way by filesystems not performing as well as expected due to > missing dir_index flags. > In case some people haven't noticed, a few days ago I released a new e2fsprogs release for e2fsprogs 1.39. New in this release is a way for distributions and system administrators to control the default filesystem features via the /etc/mke2fs.conf file. In the pre-release version, mke2fs is still using the same behaviour as before, but my plan is to change mke2fs to create filesystems with the dir_index and resize_inode features by default. People who don't like this default can always edit mke2fs.conf and change things back. - Ted _______________________________________________ Ext3-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ext3-users
