Re: [Q] Is errors=panic safe to use, and will it detect a RAID gone psycho?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Maurice Volaski schrieb:
> If I set the error behavior with tune2fs to panic, would this happen?
> That is, is this the type of error that would trigger a panic? Are there
> minor errors that could unnecessarily trigger one?

panic seems to be triggered in fs/ext3/super.c, there are some conditions
to met in ext3_handle_error() and ext3_abort(). either get a clue from
that or perhaps some ext2 guru can comment as to *when* exactly a panic is
triggered ;-)


- --
BOFH excuse #12:

dry joints on cable plug
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCxIw9C/PVm5+NVoYRAqVRAJ4iTIbmFvi1OoqqcZPyuFtzeo7OkQCg2fAO
kIOJsD6artMMh49BIYfj1Ks=
=thhq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________

Ext3-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ext3-users

[Index of Archives]         [Linux RAID]     [Kernel Development]     [Red Hat Install]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Postgresql]     [Fedora]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux