Hi, On Tue, 2004-04-20 at 18:57, Jan Kara wrote: > For 2.4 I think your patch is the best solution. Please push it. For > 2.6 I've written a patch which implements per-sb lists of dirty dquots That's only part of the problem: a million dquots on a single sb will still show this performance degradation currently. Rotating the list head after each progress will make sure that even if we are processing unnecessary dquots, we at least do so only once per sync (which is way better than 0.5*N^2 times!) But I'll push the bits to Marcelo, thanks. Cheers, Stephen _______________________________________________ Ext3-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ext3-users