Em Wed, 31 Mar 2004 12:12:01 +0100, Stephen C. Tweedie escreveu: > A _full_ checklist would include every piece of hardware in your machine, > and every module you've got compiled or loaded into the kernel, plus a ton > of privileged applications such as X. So you mean it is basically impossible, and I have to wait until more people get ext3-on-RAID5 journal aborts, including a few hackers? OK, so I've just gone back to 2.4 and will stay there for the foreseeable future. > I've been seeing some reports on raid5, yes. Current kernels look OK in > the main for most people, though there are still the occasional problems > being discovered: such is 2.6. Nothing springs to mind that particularly > matches your own symptoms, though. http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0402.3/1517.html http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0401.2/0450.html http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-raid&m=107351745306237&w=2 This was just from the linux-kernel and linux-raid archives. When I did Google around, I found some other similar ones... -- Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra <leandro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Maringá, PR, BRASIL http://br.geocities.com./lgcdutra/ Soli Deo Gloria! _______________________________________________ Ext3-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ext3-users
