On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 07:00, Robin Rosenberg wrote: > On Wednesday 03 March 2004 02:41, David Weinehall wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 08:30:32PM -0500, Andrew Ho wrote: > > > XFS is the best filesystem. > > > > Well it'd better be, it's 10 times the size of ext3, 5 times the size of > > ReiserFS and 3.5 times the size of JFS. > > > > And people say size doesn't matter. > > Recoverability matters to me. The driver could be 10 megabyte and > *I* would not care. XFS seems to stand no matter how rudely the OS > is knocked down. But XFS easily breaks down due to media defects. Once ago I used XFS, but I lost all data on one of my volumes due to a bad block on my hard disk. XFS was unable to recover from the error, and the XFS recovery tools were unable to deal with the error. _______________________________________________ Ext3-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ext3-users
