On Friday August 8, mfedyk@matchmail.com wrote: > On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 10:39:43AM +1000, Neil Brown wrote: > > - sh = get_active_stripe(conf, new_sector, pd_idx, (bi->bi_rw&RWA_MASK)); > > + sh = get_active_stripe(conf, new_sector, pd_idx, 0/*(bi->bi_rw&RWA_MASK)*/); > > Wouldn't it be better to remove instead of just commenting out that > part? Thew ugliness (hopefuly) reminds me to fix it properly. I think I can come up with a sensible use for the read-ahead flag, but I would want to think carefully about it first, and test it somewhat. NeilBrown _______________________________________________ Ext3-users@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ext3-users
