"Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Wed, 2003-04-09 at 22:07, Parker Johnson wrote: > > > Does redhat 9 come with htree optimizations for ext3fs? > > No. It was nowhere near stable enough in time. Htree is looking much > better now, though. > We're perhaps not out of the woods yet. It may be something unrelated, but... Begin forwarded message: Date: 10 Apr 2003 00:25:48 +0200 From: Martin Schlemmer <azarah@gentoo.org> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com> Cc: KML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Subject: Re: Slab corruption with ext3-handle-cache.patch On Sun, 2003-04-06 at 01:10, Andrew Morton wrote: > Martin Schlemmer <azarah@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > > > Do you have CONFIG_EXT3_FS_POSIX_ACL enabled? > > > > Nope. > > So we're leaving an inode on the orphan list. I wonder why that started > happening. Thanks. I moved all my data off that partition, removed it, and recreated it without HTREE/dir_index, and moved everything back. All issues are resolved, as well as the weird corruption I had. It seems thus that its only related to HTREE ... Regards, -- Martin Schlemmer _______________________________________________ Ext3-users@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ext3-users