Theodore Ts'o wrote: > Couple of suggestions. If you could add a <A NAME="du-df"> to the > question, that would be great, since I anticipate needing to point > people to it a lot, that would be great. I'll do so. > Also, the questions and answers about converting between version 1 and > version 2 of the journal will probably not be needed by the vast > majority of the users these days. (It only really applies to people > who started using journalling with the early ext3 code and the 2.2 > kernel.) So it might be a good idea put them in a historical section, > with an explanation that most users won't need to worry about this. > Otherwise, it might confuse newbies that are just starting to play > with ext3 today. Yes, this is legacy stuff from the beginning. I started the FAQ when everybody asked "When will there be ext3 for kernel 2.4?". That was in the days of ext3 version 0.0.5 or so ;) I'll rearrange it. > In the question "I compiled ext3 as a module and my / partition gets > mounted as ext2", I would suggest replacing the answer with the > following: [SNIP] Yes, this one was bogus from the beginning. Thanks for your new answer! > Other than that these minor changes, the FAQ looks pretty good! > Thanks for taking the time to write it. Well, as I'm no coder I could only contribute this way (besides reporting problems)... Regards, Juri _______________________________________________ Ext3-users@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ext3-users
