Hi, On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 11:09:17AM +0200, Fabien Combernous wrote: > Actualy i'm looking for documents about journalised file system, in > order to be able to compare them self. I need accurate information if i > want to make a good study. > > Features \ fs | xfs | ext3 | jfs | reiserfs | > ------------------------------------------------- > chattr | ? | Y | ? | ? | > ------------------------------------------------- > quotas | Y | ? | Y | ? | > ------------------------------------------------- > removable fs | ? | ? | N | ? | > ------------------------------------------------- > NFS | Y | Y | ? | ? | > ------------------------------------------------- > samba | ? | ? | ? | ? | > ------------------------------------------------- > coda | ? | ? | ? | ? | > ------------------------------------------------- ext3 is "Y" to all the above except for coda. Coda is an entire filesystem all to itself: it does not run on top of another filesystem. So, Coda support is "N" for all filesystems except for Coda. :-) InterMezzo, on the other hand, can use ext3 as its cache filesystem. > I know bonnie++ as disk tool tester, but i would like to have several > points of view with several tools. Also be aware that ext3's default journaling mode is more conservative than most other filesystems', and that it provides ordering guarantees for data as well as metadata, which hurts it in some benchmarks. You can mount with "-o data=writeback" to fall back to unordered data writes. Cheers, Stephen _______________________________________________ Ext3-users@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ext3-users
