Neil,
I think this is a better fix...
--- 2.4.19-pre10/fs/jbd/transaction.c~ext3-buffer-time Wed Jun 5 23:34:07 2002
+++ 2.4.19-pre10-akpm/fs/jbd/transaction.c Wed Jun 5 23:48:02 2002
@@ -1092,7 +1092,6 @@ int journal_dirty_metadata (handle_t *ha
spin_lock(&journal_datalist_lock);
set_bit(BH_JBDDirty, &bh->b_state);
- set_buffer_flushtime(bh);
J_ASSERT_JH(jh, jh->b_transaction != NULL);
@@ -2015,6 +2014,13 @@ void journal_file_buffer(struct journal_
spin_unlock(&journal_datalist_lock);
}
+static void jbd_refile_buffer(struct buffer_head *bh)
+{
+ if (buffer_dirty(bh) && (bh->b_list != BUF_DIRTY))
+ set_buffer_flushtime(bh);
+ refile_buffer(bh);
+}
+
/*
* Remove a buffer from its current buffer list in preparation for
* dropping it from its current transaction entirely. If the buffer has
@@ -2042,7 +2048,7 @@ void __journal_refile_buffer(struct jour
J_ASSERT_JH(jh, jh->b_transaction->t_state == T_RUNNING);
} else {
/* Onto BUF_DIRTY for writeback */
- refile_buffer(jh2bh(jh));
+ jbd_refile_buffer(jh2bh(jh));
}
}
-
