postfix and ext3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C1B1D0.D0468140
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="windows-1255"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I am running postfix on RH machine. decided to upgrade one of my =
machines from 7.1 to 7.2 - performance drop of 75
percent !!!!!

moved back to ext2(remount partition as ext2) - performance is back.

on the 7.1 upgraded to ext3 (only the disks), rebooted - performance
drop of 70 percent...

used a 2.4.17 kernel compiled by myself - a little faster then the
last RH kernel, but still runs at third of the best speed !!!

mountext all partitions as ext3 except /var (postfix queue is there) - =
performance is good.

any comments, suggestions ? i don't thiink it's an acceptable compromise =
to loose 75% performance to gain better recoverablility, considering the =
stability of linux.

Alex

------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C1B1D0.D0468140
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="windows-1255"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dwindows-1255">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2600.0" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial>I am running postfix on RH machine. decided to =
upgrade one=20
of my machines from 7.1 to 7.2 - performance drop of 75<BR>percent=20
!!!!!<BR><BR>moved back to ext2(remount partition as ext2)&nbsp;- =
performance is=20
back.<BR><BR>on the 7.1 upgraded to ext3 (only the disks), rebooted -=20
performance<BR>drop of 70 percent...<BR><BR>used a 2.4.17 kernel =
compiled by=20
myself - a little faster then the<BR>last RH kernel, but still runs at =
third of=20
the best speed !!!</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial>mountext all partitions as ext3 except /var =
(postfix queue=20
is there)&nbsp;- performance is good.</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT><BR>any comments, suggestions ? i don't=20
thiink&nbsp;it's an acceptable compromise to loose 75% performance to =
gain=20
better recoverablility, considering the stability of linux.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial>Alex</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C1B1D0.D0468140--





[Index of Archives]         [Linux RAID]     [Kernel Development]     [Red Hat Install]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Postgresql]     [Fedora]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux