On Wed 05-07-23 15:01:01, Jeff Layton wrote: > In later patches, we're going to change how the inode's ctime field is > used. Switch to using accessor functions instead of raw accesses of > inode->i_ctime. > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> Looks good. Feel free to add: Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> Honza > --- > fs/ecryptfs/inode.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c b/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c > index 83274915ba6d..b491bb239c8f 100644 > --- a/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c > +++ b/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c > @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ static int ecryptfs_do_unlink(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, > } > fsstack_copy_attr_times(dir, lower_dir); > set_nlink(inode, ecryptfs_inode_to_lower(inode)->i_nlink); > - inode->i_ctime = dir->i_ctime; > + inode_set_ctime_to_ts(inode, inode_get_ctime(dir)); > out_unlock: > dput(lower_dentry); > inode_unlock(lower_dir); > -- > 2.41.0 > -- Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx> SUSE Labs, CR
