On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 11/21/2017 09:33 AM, James Muir wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 4:43 PM, James Muir >> <james.muir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> There were some changes made in the msm linux kernel (msm8998) to add >>> hw support to ecryptfs. >>> >>> Unfortunately, those changes break basic ecryptfs usage; >> >> <snip> >> >>> This regression was introduced in the following commit: >>> >>> https://github.com/sonyxperiadev/kernel/commit/8928f8683bcd0236f5653963deee3bc225fb2206 >>> >>> That commit is also present in aosp (e.g. the Pixel 2 uses the >>> msm8998; but note that the aosp kernels do not enable ecryptfs). >> >> Since my message was essentially a bug report (without a patch), it >> might be that linux-arm-msm was not the right place to submit it. >> >> Does anyone know of a better way to report msm kernel bugs to Qualcomm? > > I can't help here but it might be useful to directly contact the author > of the patch that introduced the regression. Thanks, Tyler. Contacting the author was the first thing I did. I sent email on 17 Oct and then again on 6 Nov. Unfortunately, they have not been responsive. I may try reaching out to some of the other msm devs who have made changes under fs/ecryptfs. -James M -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ecryptfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
