On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 9:23 AM, James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 3 May 2016, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > >> The return value of evm_update_evmxattr is never used. > > Perhaps it should be used, otherwise there are potential silent failure > paths in the EVM code. Yes, perhaps. That's not the only place in EVM / IMA where such failures are silently ignored though; the code seems to need some work. Thanks, Andreas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ecryptfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
