Tyler, Am 04.08.2015 um 01:07 schrieb Tyler Hicks: >> Okay, then I'd argument to give my patch a try although it is not the solution >> to the problem I've reported. :-) >> If you don't mind I'll resend with a proper changelog. > > That patch isn't correct since it assumes that all eCryptfs super blocks > are equal if the lower paths (and, ultimately, the lower inode) are > equal. However, the lower path is only one of many properties of an > eCryptfs superblock. For example, the second mount may have been > configured to use a different file encryption key. How would this work if I mount /foo using AES to /mnt_a and /foo again using 3DES to /mnt_b? Wouldn't both ecrytpfs instances kill each other's files? Thanks, //richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ecryptfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
