It is slightly different-rws--x--x 1 root root 13740 febr 3 18.36 /sbin/mount.ecryptfs_private*
since my last mail I have re-emerged ecryptfs utils with suid flag, so now I can mount my private
is this really absolutely necessary to have suid bit on the executables? This is looks dangerous to me :)
Thanks Laszlo On 2012. február 6. 18:51:31, Dustin Kirkland wrote:
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Space Cake<spacecakex@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:After some kernel update and I've got the following error when I try to mount .private setreuid: Operation not permitted ERROR: Could not mount private ecryptfs directory same error when I try to re-create encrypted directory... what's wrong?What are the permissions of /sbin/mount.ecryptfs_private? It should look like this, 4755. $ ls -alF /sbin/mount.ecryptfs_private -rwsr-xr-x 1 root root 18784 2011-12-13 15:11 /sbin/mount.ecryptfs_private*
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME kriptográfiai aláírás
