On Tue, 2024-11-19 at 10:40 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
[...]
I tried the following test on top of this patch-set:
----- 8< ----------------------------------------
#!/bin/bash
cat <<EOF | clang -o btf-and-dwarf.o -c -x c -g - || exit 1
struct test_val { int i; } g;
EOF
pahole --btf_encode btf-and-dwarf.o || exit 1
# Note: has to be llvm-strip, otherwise --no-strip-all is not available
llvm-strip -o only-dwarf.o --no-strip-all -R .BTF -R .BTF.ext btf-and-dwarf.o
llvm-strip -o only-btf.o --no-strip-all --strip-debug btf-and-dwarf.o
for fmt in none btf dwarf dwarf,btf; do
for file in no-such-file only-btf.o only-dwarf.o btf-and-dwarf.o; do
if [ "$fmt" == "none" ]; then
cmd="pahole"
else
cmd="pahole -F ${fmt}"
fi
printf -- "------ PAHOLE_VMLINUX_BTF_FILENAME=%-20s %-20s ------\n" "${file}" "${cmd}"
PAHOLE_VMLINUX_BTF_FILENAME=$file $cmd 2>&1 | grep -P '(test_val|pahole:)'
done
done
---------------------------------------- >8 -----
And there are a few surprising (to me) results, namely:
------ PAHOLE_VMLINUX_BTF_FILENAME=only-dwarf.o pahole ------
pahole: couldn't find any debug information on this system.
...
------ PAHOLE_VMLINUX_BTF_FILENAME=only-dwarf.o pahole -F dwarf ------
pahole: couldn't find any debug information on this system.
...
------ PAHOLE_VMLINUX_BTF_FILENAME=btf-and-dwarf.o pahole -F dwarf ------
pahole: couldn't find any debug information on this system.
...
------ PAHOLE_VMLINUX_BTF_FILENAME=only-dwarf.o pahole -F dwarf,btf ------
pahole: couldn't find any debug information on this system.
...
It looks like DWARF is never loaded.
llvm-dwarfdump shows that DWARF is indeed present in only-dwarf.o and
btf-and-dwarf.o. Is this an expected behaviour?
