On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 10:13:32AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 12:57:44PM +0000, Alan Maguire wrote:
> > On 18/11/2024 20:41, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > In systems where BTF isn't available there were reports that the
> > > simplest pahole call, without any args, segfaults.
>
> > > To have a proper test before fixing this problem, allow overriding the
> > > /sys/kernel/btf/vmlinux filename, so that even in systems with BTF we an
> > > point it to a invalid location, making pahole think that there is no BTF
> > > available and thus fallback to something that currently segfaults.
>
> <SNIP>
>
> > Reviewed-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks!
Ah, thanks, added to the cset,
- Arnaldo
> > Small thing - would it be worth dropping the _FILENAME suffix of the
> > envvar to just have PAHOLE_VMLINUX_BTF? One other thing below..
>
> See below ends up being related to the other point you made.
>
> > > +++ b/pahole.c
> > > @@ -3754,7 +3754,7 @@ try_sole_arg_as_class_names:
> > > if (filename &&
> > > strstarts(filename, "/sys/kernel/btf/") &&
> > > strstr(filename, "/vmlinux") == NULL) {
> > > - base_btf_file = "/sys/kernel/btf/vmlinux";
> > > + base_btf_file = vmlinux_path__btf_filename();
> >
> > so in this case, we are specifying a module in /sys/kernel/btf and
> > implicitly we use /sys/kernel/btf/vmlinux as the base. I wonder if
> > there's much value for the envvar override here; I guess it might allow
> > us to test using a mismatched base vmlinux with split BTF?
>
> Right, that would be possible with this patch as-is, which may be
> useful, we may want to have PAHOLE_VMLINUX_BTF_DIR as a counterpart to
> PAHOLE_VMLINUX_BTF_FILENAME, that would allow us to use some different
> directory with both vmlinux and modules.
>
> Having both allows more flexibility, picking some arbitrary vmlinux
> plust some arbitrary directory with modules, etc. So I'd keep the patch
> as is and at some point add the PAHOLE_VMLINUX_BTF_DIR knob.
>
> - Arnaldo
>
> > > conf_load.base_btf = btf__parse(base_btf_file, NULL);
> > > if (libbpf_get_error(conf_load.base_btf)) {
> > > fprintf(stderr, "Failed to parse base BTF '%s': %ld\n",
