Re: pahole -J usage in kernel scripts/link-vmlinux.sh

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 4:28 PM Fangrui Song <maskray@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi BTF folks,
>
> I have discovered some problems with pahole -J.
> Its usage in kernel scripts/link-vmlinux.sh is like (make LLVM=1 bzImage):
>
> ld.lld -m elf_x86_64 --emit-relocs --discard-none -z max-page-size=0x200000 --build-id=sha1 --orphan-handling=warn -o .tmp_vmlinux.btf -T ./arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds --whole-archive arch/x86/kernel/head_64.o arch/x86/kernel/head64.o arch/x86/kernel/ebda.o arch/x86/kernel/platform-quirks.o init/built-in.a usr/built-in.a arch/x86/built-in.a kernel/built-in.a certs/built-in.a mm/built-in.a fs/built-in.a ipc/built-in.a security/built-in.a crypto/built-in.a block/built-in.a lib/built-in.a arch/x86/lib/built-in.a lib/lib.a arch/x86/lib/lib.a drivers/built-in.a sound/built-in.a net/built-in.a virt/built-in.a arch/x86/pci/built-in.a arch/x86/power/built-in.a arch/x86/video/built-in.a --no-whole-archive --start-group --end-group
> pahole -J .tmp_vmlinux.btf
> llvm-objcopy --only-section=.BTF --set-section-flags .BTF=alloc,readonly --strip-all .tmp_vmlinux.btf .btf.vmlinux.bin.o
>
> pahole -J adds .BTF and rewrites .tmp_vmlinux.btf, then llvm-objcopy produces .btf.vmlinux.bin.o of just one section.
> Why doesn't pahole provide a command generating an object file with just the .BTF section?
>

We just recently discussed adding this. So the reason is that
historically pahole never had this feature and no one bothered to add
it.

>
>
> When I contributed https://git.kernel.org/linus/90ceddcb495008ac8ba7a3dce297841efcd7d584 ,
> I remember pahole at that time added a non-SHF_ALLOC .BTF , now (1.20) .BTF becomes SHF_ALLOC.

I don't think anything changed in 1.20 about how .BTF is added. pahole
still uses the same llvm-objcopt and it doesn't add SHF_ALLOC. And I
just double-checked that after running pahole -j .tmp_vmlinux.btf has
non-allocatable .BTF section:

$ llvm-readelf -S ~/tmp/pahole-vmlinux-output.o | grep BTF
  [13] .BTF_ids          PROGBITS        ffffffff822b6804 14b6804
000510 00   A  0   0  1
  [43] .BTF              PROGBITS        0000000000000000 18bc0e8c
4c8056 00      0   0  1


> This is problematic if pahole does not have full-fledged binary manipulation ability (objcopy,llvm-objcopy).
>
> In particular, there are two bugs:
>
> * pahole does not respect max-page-size (p_align of PT_LOAD). See the .text section, its
>    sh_offset != sh_addr (mod max-page-size)
>
>   Section Headers:
>     [Nr] Name              Type            Address          Off    Size   ES Flg Lk Inf Al
>     [ 0]                   NULL            0000000000000000 000000 000000 00      0   0  0
> -  [ 1] .text             PROGBITS        ffffffff81000000 200000 1003917 00  AX  0   0 4096
> +  [ 1] .text             PROGBITS        ffffffff81000000 001000 e0169a 00  AX  0   0 4096
>
> * pahole does not rewrite p_offset/p_filesz of PT_LOAD segments.
>    Because of the first bug, pahole -J rewritten object file generally has small offsets.
>    If p_offset/p_filesz of PT_LOAD segments are not rewritten, the file offset range of .symtab may be within
>    a PT_LOAD range. llvm-objcopy --strip-all considers .symtab as part of the PT_LOAD and refuses --strip-all:
>
>    error: '.tmp_vmlinux.btf': string table '.strtab' cannot be removed because it is referenced by the symbol table '.symtab'
>
>    This is very rare, though.
>
>
> So I suggest:
>
> * pahole -J: restore the previous non-SHF_ALLOC behavior. Don't rewrite sh_offset of existing sections.

so nothing changed (at least as of 1.20) about how pahole adds .BTF,
so I'd like to understand why our observations differ

>    Place the new non-SHF_ALLOC .BTF section at the end.
>    Then not rewriting PT_LOAD will be justified.
> * Add a new option incorporating the current pahole -J + llvm-objcopy

pahole is already using llvm-objcopy. Do you mean to add a mode where
pahole will dump a separate ELF object file with just .BTF? Or
something else?




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux