Em Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 01:27:31AM +0100, Mark Wielaard escreveu: > DW_TAG_call_site and DW_TAG_call_site_parameter are the standardized > DWARF5 versions of DW_TAG_GNU_call_site and DW_TAG_GNU call_site_parameter. > Handle them the same way (which is by ignoring them). Thanks, I added these two lines, plese let me know if you're not ok with it: Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922698 Signed-off-by: Mark Wielaard <mark@xxxxxxxxx> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922698 > --- > dwarf_loader.c | 7 +++++++ > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/dwarf_loader.c b/dwarf_loader.c > index ac22c1b..3bdf570 100644 > --- a/dwarf_loader.c > +++ b/dwarf_loader.c > @@ -41,6 +41,11 @@ struct strings *strings; > #define DW_TAG_GNU_call_site_parameter 0x410a > #endif > > +#ifndef DW_TAG_call_site > +#define DW_TAG_call_site 0x48 > +#define DW_TAG_call_site_parameter 0x49 > +#endif > + > #define hashtags__fn(key) hash_64(key, HASHTAGS__BITS) > > bool no_bitfield_type_recode = true; > @@ -1595,6 +1600,8 @@ static int die__process_function(Dwarf_Die *die, struct ftype *ftype, > uint32_t id; > > switch (dwarf_tag(die)) { > + case DW_TAG_call_site: > + case DW_TAG_call_site_parameter: > case DW_TAG_GNU_call_site: > case DW_TAG_GNU_call_site_parameter: > /* > -- > 2.20.1 > -- - Arnaldo
