Re: encoding BTF on glibc was: Re: [PATCH pahole 0/3] fix handling of bitfields in btf_loader

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/25/19 9:37 PM, Yonghong Song wrote:
> I am not 100% sure whether pahole dwarf/btf parity is considered
> as a strong reason to add floating point type support in BTF or not.

I wouldn't add floating point to BTF yet.
BTF is not trying to replace dwarf.
Let's make it working well for BPF use cases first.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux