2016년 02월 04일 11:17에 Krzysztof Kozlowski 이(가) 쓴 글:
> On 03.02.2016 21:42, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>> Drivers should use %p for printing pointers instead of hardcoding them
>> as hexadecimal integers. This patch fixes compilation warnings on 64bit
>> architectures.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fimc.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_gsc.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_ipp.c | 32 ++++++++++++++---------------
>> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_rotator.c | 2 +-
>> 4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fimc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fimc.c
>> index c747824..8a4f4a0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fimc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fimc.c
>> @@ -1723,7 +1723,7 @@ static int fimc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> goto err_put_clk;
>> }
>>
>> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("id[%d]ippdrv[0x%x]\n", ctx->id, (int)ippdrv);
>> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("id[%d]ippdrv[%p]\n", ctx->id, ippdrv);
>
> I don't oppose the patch itself but I have different concern. First -
> probably you meant %pK because this is a writeable structure with
> function pointers.
> Second - why the ippdrv has to be printed? Is it useful for debugging?
Marek fixed just compilation warnings on ARM64 so yes it wouldn't need to print out ippdrv address but as other cleanup patch.
Thanks,
Inki Dae
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
