Hi, 2016-01-25 Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Hey, > > Op 21-01-16 om 13:49 schreef Gustavo Padovan: > > From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Hi, > > > > The following patches are some clean ups on the sync framework before > > we start the actual de-staging. The main changes here are the move of > > SW_SYNC_USER to debugfs. Removal of struct sync_pt in favor of direct > > use of struct fence. And the rename of sync_fence to sync_file, a name > > to better reflect what it is for, a struct that connects struct fence(s) > > to a file. > > > > Please review. Thanks. > > > > Gustavo Padovan (11): > > staging/android: fix sync framework documentation > > staging/android: sync: remove interfaces that are not used > > staging/android: remove not used sync_timeline ops > > staging/android: create a 'sync' dir for debugfs information > > staging/android: move SW_SYNC_USER to a debugfs file > > staging/android: rename sync_fence to sync_file > > staging/android: rename 'sync_pt' to 'fence' in struct sync_fence_cb > > staging/android: remove struct sync_pt > > staging/android: remove unused var from sync_timeline_signal() > > staging/android: remove pointless sync_timeline_signal at destroy > > phase > > staging/android: remove sync_fence_create_dma() > > > For whole series: > Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Renaming sync_fence to sync_file makes sense, it should hopefully reduce confusion. Poke. What is missing for this to go upstream? Do I need more review here? Thanks. Gustavo _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
