Daniel Stone <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Hi, > > On 27 January 2016 at 14:16, Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 27 January 2016 at 11:45, Daniel Stone <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> The Requires will take care of that, so you can just bin the entire >>> 'Libs:' field until you need one: >>> >> In theory this will be sufficient, but Eric wasn't buying it [1] :'-(. >> He's main consern (if I understood him correctly) is to stay >> consistent with the existing libdrm_* providers, regardless if things >> look a bit quirky. > > I suspect he was missing that 'Requires' also pulls in the relevant > flags from those libraries, so PKG_CHECK_MODULES(DRM_VC4, > [libdrm-vc4]) is equivalent to PKG_CHECK_MODULES(DRM_VC4, [libdrm > libdrm-vc4]), if libdrm-vc4.pc has 'Requires: libdrm'. What I heard Emil arguing to me was that a pkg-config request for --libs From libdrm_vc4 shouldn't link against libdrm. I'm fine with dropping Libs and Cflags, as long as we still link libdrm like normal. This all seems like pointless bikeshedding, though.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
