Hi Reinette, Thanks for the patch. I've actually made a similar patch one some 12 hours ago. Silly me forgot to push it - it's in master now. On 27 January 2016 at 21:29, Chatre, Reinette <reinette.chatre@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Stefan, > > On 2016-01-27, Stefan Agner wrote: >> [added Emil to CC] >> Hm, I wonder why that did not happen on my system. What OS/gcc version >> do you use? > > On my host I am building an image using Yocto (http://www.yoctoproject.org/) to contain latest libdrm. In case you are not familiar with Yocto this system will first create its own build environment (think sysroot) and then build this library within it. Since the build environment is separate from host it is very sensitive to dependencies being correct and could explain why this issue is not encountered by folks building on and for their hosts. I have been doing this daily without issue since about April of last year. The version I am using relies on gcc 4.9.2. > Err... sorry I'm not sure how that explains it. The missing symbol has been part of libdrm.so since forever, so regardless which version gets picked (the host one or not) it wouldn't error out in such a way. I'm leaning that it's due to different LDFLAGS - what are you using ? The first 'offender' that comes to mind is --as-needed although I might be mistaking. Thanks for the report, it should be working fine now. Emil _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
