On 27 January 2016 at 11:42, Daniel Stone <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hey, > > On 27 January 2016 at 09:38, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 09:04:18PM +0000, Emil Velikov wrote: >>> On 11 January 2016 at 19:32, Emmanuel Gil Peyrot >>> <emmanuel.peyrot@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> > This adds R8, RG88 and GR88, as well as the non-subsampled NV24/NV42 formats. >>> > >>> Err... please don't copy/paste 'random' hunks here. These headers >>> should be imported from the kernel with the commit message mentioning >>> the sha of their origin. >>> >>> I've been procrastinating^Wwaiting on some upstream changes to land >>> and with those in place I'll update the Makefile to import things >>> properly. >> >> Yeah, we should have some scripts in libdrm that runs make >> headers_install, copies over the latest generated uapi headers for drm and >> then creates a commit with the sha1 it was generated from. Maybe even a >> rule that the sha1 has to be from Dave's drm-next. > > Yeah, it's certainly doable, once some kernel-internal details are > shuffled out of uapi/drm/drm_mode.h. What do you have in mind - DRM_MODE_PICTURE_ASPECT_* ? I'm thinking more that we should bring back DRM_MODE_OBJECT_* as it breaks libdrm and maybe other userspace. Feel free to let me know here or in the patch I just sent (didn't realise and I Cc'd your collabora email). Thanks Emil _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
