On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 4:13 AM, Michel Dänzer <michel@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@xxxxxxx> > > Not doing so makes it impossible for radeon_bo_open callers to set any > RADEON_GEM_* flags for the newly created BO. Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@xxxxxxx> > --- > radeon/radeon_bo_gem.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/radeon/radeon_bo_gem.c b/radeon/radeon_bo_gem.c > index c9fe19f..fbd453d 100644 > --- a/radeon/radeon_bo_gem.c > +++ b/radeon/radeon_bo_gem.c > @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ static struct radeon_bo *bo_open(struct radeon_bo_manager *bom, > args.size = size; > args.alignment = alignment; > args.initial_domain = bo->base.domains; > - args.flags = 0; > + args.flags = flags; > args.handle = 0; > r = drmCommandWriteRead(bom->fd, DRM_RADEON_GEM_CREATE, > &args, sizeof(args)); > -- > 2.7.0.rc3 > > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
