On 21.01.2016 16:58, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 03:41:27PM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote: >> On 21.01.2016 15:38, Michel Dänzer wrote: >>> On 21.01.2016 14:31, Mario Kleiner wrote: >>>> On 01/21/2016 04:43 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote: >>>>> On 21.01.2016 05:32, Mario Kleiner wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> So the problem is that AMDs hardware frame counters reset to >>>>>> zero during a modeset. The old DRM code dealt with drivers doing that by >>>>>> keeping vblank irqs enabled during modesets and incrementing vblank >>>>>> count by one during each vblank irq, i think that's what >>>>>> drm_vblank_pre_modeset() and drm_vblank_post_modeset() were meant for. >>>>> >>>>> Right, looks like there's been a regression breaking this. I suspect the >>>>> problem is that vblank->last isn't getting updated from >>>>> drm_vblank_post_modeset. Not sure which change broke that though, or how >>>>> to fix it. Ville? >>>>> >>>> >>>> The whole logic has changed and the software counter updates are now >>>> driven all the time by the hw counter. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> BTW, I'm seeing a similar issue with drm_vblank_on/off as well, which >>>>> exposed the bug fixed by 209e4dbc ("drm/vblank: Use u32 consistently for >>>>> vblank counters"). I've been meaning to track that down since then; one >>>>> of these days hopefully, but if anybody has any ideas offhand... >>>> >>>> I spent the last few hours reading through the drm and radeon code and i >>>> think what should probably work is to replace the >>>> drm_vblank_pre/post_modeset calls in radeon/amdgpu by drm_vblank_off/on >>>> calls. These are apparently meant for drivers whose hw counters reset >>>> during modeset, [...] >>> >>> ... just like drm_vblank_pre/post_modeset. That those were broken is a >>> regression which needs to be fixed anyway. I don't think switching to >>> drm_vblank_on/off is suitable for stable trees. >> >> Even more so since as I mentioned, there is (has been since at least >> about half a year ago) a counter jumping bug with drm_vblank_on/off as well. > > Hm, never noticed you reported that. I thought the reason for not picking > up my drm_vblank_on/off patches was that there's a bug in amdgpu userspace > where it tried to use vblank waits on a disabled pipe? http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2015-July/086451.html I don't know why it didn't get picked up. > Can you please point me at the vblank on/off jump bug please? AFAIR I originally reported it in response to http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2015-August/087841.html , but I can't find that in the archives, so maybe that was just on IRC. See http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2016-January/099122.html . Basically, I ran into the bug fixed by your patch because the counter jumped forward on every DPMS off, so it hit the 32-bit boundary after just a few days. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel