On 19.01.2016 01:05, Emil Velikov wrote: > > A few of those are already implicit with either Wall or Wextra. Both > of which, imho, are a must have for any serious project. I think -Wextra is generally too noisy for that, but I guess we're now deeply in arguing about taste territory. > But seriously - it makes me think that people are rushed to write the > code and get it out. Or perhaps a too strong "no warnings" policy ? > After all warnings are to hint that things can be improved/might be > wrong. If it looks trivial, just ignore it :-) One problem with that is that leaving trivial/irrelevant/incorrect warnings makes it easier to miss important warnings. That being said, I fully agree that one should resist the urge to just get rid of warnings in whatever way. (I tend to cringe whenever a commit log says something along the lines of "fix warning" — a change either fixes a problem which was pointed out by the warning, or it just silences the warning.) -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
