On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 09:52:27AM +0000, Liviu.Dudau@xxxxxxx wrote: > On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 10:17:54PM +0200, Jyri Sarha wrote: > > It just makes me wonder if drm_atomic_helper_connector_dpms() should > > call the legacy callback automatically if DRIVER_ATOMIC is not set or > > at least bail out gracefully with an error message. Then again it may > > be overkill if the tda998x is the only driver that need to support > > both situations. > > I would guess that in general it makes sense for the core code to do what > you suggest, but the idea is to try to encourage the drivers to convert > to atomic ops rather than give them too many crutches. And the tda998x will > need this for a short period of time until tilcdc converts as well. It's not just tilcdc that this driver is used by. I have no plans at present to convert armada to atomic mode setting, although I occasionally push it (I hope) towards that goal. This isn't going to happen quickly, because I've other areas that need work too. -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net. _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
