gcc warns about the timestamp in drm_wait_vblank being possibly
used without an initialization:
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c: In function 'drm_wait_vblank':
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c:1755:28: warning: 'now.tv_usec' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
vblwait->reply.tval_usec = now.tv_usec;
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c:1754:27: warning: 'now.tv_sec' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
vblwait->reply.tval_sec = now.tv_sec;
This can happen if drm_vblank_count_and_time() returns 0 in its
error path. To sanitize the error case, I'm changing that function
to return a zero timestamp when it fails.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
Fixes: e6ae8687a87b ("drm: idiot-proof vblank")
---
I'm going through the maybe-unused warnings in randconfig builds, this one is
apparently not a false positive, although it only happens if something
else has already gone wrong.
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
index d12a4efa651b..d32ff169fdb8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
@@ -939,8 +939,10 @@ u32 drm_vblank_count_and_time(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned int pipe,
int count = DRM_TIMESTAMP_MAXRETRIES;
u32 cur_vblank;
- if (WARN_ON(pipe >= dev->num_crtcs))
+ if (WARN_ON(pipe >= dev->num_crtcs)) {
+ *vblanktime = (struct timeval) { 0 };
return 0;
+ }
/*
* Vblank timestamps are read lockless. To ensure consistency the vblank
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
