On Monday 11 January 2016 11:12:56 Liviu Dudau wrote: > On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 09:39:46AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Monday 04 January 2016 09:24:16 Thierry Reding wrote: > > > > > > Ugh... wouldn't it be much simpler to get rid of DRM_ARM? It seems like > > > a completely superfluous option to me. I don't think we've ever had the > > > equivalent of "vendor" Kconfig options in DRM, and I don't see why we'd > > > need to start now. If ARM was going to add another driver it can simply > > > have a separate Kconfig entry. There should be no need to select the > > > vendor option first. > > > > Fine with me too. I vaguely remembered having seen some discussion about > > this, so I decided to do a minimal fix, but I agree that would be more > > in line with the other drivers. > > > > Arnd > > > > Arnd, > > I'm OK with the whole series of Kconfig clean-up/fixes and I offer my appologies > for adding noise with my patchset. Please let me know how do you prefer to handle > them. I'm OK with merging your changes into my series before sending the pull > request to David Airlie. Please merge them into your tree if you have some other changes to send to him. I just realized that these are in your own git tree at the moment, not in drm-next. I guess that means you will rebase the whole series after -rc1 and submit it into linux-4.6, right? If so, just fold my fixes into your patches when you rebase. Arnd _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
