On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 3:58 AM, Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Rob, > > Thanks for review. > > > On 12/09/2015 04:47 AM, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 02:49:05PM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote: >>> SiI8620 transmitter converts eTMDS/HDMI signal to MHL 3.0. It is controlled >>> via I2C bus. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> .../bindings/video/bridge/sil-sii8620.txt | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+) >>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/bridge/sil-sii8620.txt >>> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/bridge/sil-sii8620.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/bridge/sil-sii8620.txt [...] >>> + port { >>> + mhl_to_hdmi: endpoint { >>> + remote-endpoint = <&hdmi_to_mhl>; >>> + }; >>> + }; >> I'd like to see this have a port to a connector node, too. Possibly >> that can come later. > > MHL standard is connector agnostic, usually MHL wires are routed > via multi-function microUSB connector, which can serve also for > USB/charging/UART.... > There is additional logic to determine which cable is currently > connected, usually > implemented by extcon driver. > I am not sure if/how it should be represented in DT. What do you think > about it? Probably all the more reason to have a connector defined, but for muxed connectors I'm not sure how we should handle them and having both drm connectors and extcon connectors is a problem. Like I said, it can come later. Rob _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel