On Mon, 07 Dec 2015, Archit Taneja <architt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 12/07/2015 02:40 PM, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Mon, 07 Dec 2015, Archit Taneja <architt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On 12/07/2015 02:15 PM, Jani Nikula wrote: >>>> On Mon, 07 Dec 2015, Archit Taneja <architt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> Any suggestions on how to fix this? Is it ok to make DRM_MIPI_DSI >>>>> depend on CONFIG_OF? >>>> >>>> Please don't. >>> >>> Just curious, how did x86 use DSI if the only way to create DSI devices >>> until now was via DT? >> >> Oh, you want the gory details... we use the DSI code as a library for >> abstraction and helpers, without actually creating or registering the >> devices. > > Okay, got it. I'll go with the IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) approach. Thanks, appreciated, so i915 doesn't need to depend on OF. > Humble request: Next time if I share something that doesn't make sense, > please reply with something more than a "Please don't". That just sounds > condescending and doesn't really help me with my cause either. That's a fair request, no need to be humble about it. Apologies. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
