On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 5:42 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 12:26:19PM +0100, Lucas Stach wrote: >> I see where you are going here and I appreciate that this discussion >> isn't a exercise in bikeshed, but based on technical facts. > > It would be nice (for the sake of this discussion not getting heated) > if Rob could show that he's been reading my replies to his questions. > My impression so far is that I'm being ignored. Evidence being Rob's > assertion that his points have not been addressed, where I've replied > with the technical responses - and not one of those has seen any kind > of reply. Sorry, I had missed your reply before I did reply. In any case, I'm satisfied with the reasoning and the virtual node is fine. I do want to see a note in the binding doc about why the compatible string is not specific. Rob _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
