Am Freitag, den 04.12.2015, 17:13 +0000 schrieb Russell King - ARM Linux: > On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 12:08:47PM -0500, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux > > <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 03:00:03PM +0100, Lucas Stach wrote: > > >> Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Although, I would like to be copied on patches, I don't think we > > > have a way to encode that information in MAINTAINERS. > > > > >From the top of the MAINTAINERS file: > > > > Descriptions of section entries: > > > > P: Person (obsolete) > > M: Mail patches to: FullName <address@domain> > > R: Designated reviewer: FullName <address@domain> > > These reviewers should be CCed on patches. > > > > So I guess that'd mean you want to be a reviewer? > > Oh, that got agreed upon? I thought there was pushback against that > idea. > There was pushback to change random people in MAINTAINERS from maintainer to reviewer just because they don't manage a git tree on their own. The reviewer tag itself was agreed upon. If you want to be CC'ed on patches we should definitely add you as a reviewer. -- Pengutronix e.K. | Lucas Stach | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
