Hi Dan, On 2 December 2015 at 22:58, Daniel Stone <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hey, > > On 2 December 2015 at 22:26, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 11:35:16AM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote: >>> Yes, I have thought about basing vc4-gpu-tools off of intel-gpu-tools. >>> I've actually tried to build and use the kms testing stuff on vc4, and >>> it was a total bust. Someone needs to do a lot of work to make igt >>> useful for non-intel. If you'd like me to build my vc4 testing inside >>> of igt, I'd someone to demo one of my tests building inside of igt, with >>> the test runner working and none of the intel-specific tests reporting >>> failure, and get me permission to just push code to that repository >>> (It's hard enough getting piglit tests reviewed, vc4-specific tests and >>> tools would never get review). >> >> Daniel Stone claimed that this Just Works but evidently it doesn't. >> There's some autoconfig fail where igt wants too much intel crap that just >> doesn't build on arm. Iirc Daniel had some patches floating around for >> that. > > Yeah, it was working, though with my ARM farm still being in pieces, I > haven't been able to keep on top of it lately. Apparently the patch to > disable the ancilliary tools fixes the build, so I'll get that pushed > when I can actually test it, or for the meantime: > http://paste.fedoraproject.org/296836/09692714 > Afaict pretty much all of the binaries "disabled" with this patch are intel specific. As such please throw a configure switch (enabled by default) rather than the current build_x86 heuristic, otherwise things are bound to get very ugly pretty quickly. > This does still require libpciaccess and libdrm-intel to be built, but > they _are_ totally possible to build on ARM, without any stupid hacks. > My first cut at getting igt running on ARM (before Micah took over) > actually started by eviscerating those as well, but it ended up being > too much of a yak-shave. > The libpciaccess will be a pain although libdrm-intel should be relatively easier. I doubt people will have major issues if the former requirement stays forever. Thanks Emil _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
