Re: [PATCH v4 06/13] drm/bridge: Add Synopsys DesignWare MIPI DSI host controller driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 11/26/2015 04:04 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 03:03:54PM +0800, Chris Zhong wrote:
Hi Thierry

Thanks for your feedback.


On 11/21/2015 12:07 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 04:15:32PM +0800, Chris Zhong wrote:
add Synopsys DesignWare MIPI DSI host controller driver support.

Signed-off-by: Chris Zhong <zyw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

Changes in v4:
eliminate some warnning

Changes in v3: None
Changes in v2: None

  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Kconfig       |   11 +
  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Makefile      |    1 +
  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dw_mipi_dsi.c | 1056 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  include/drm/bridge/dw_mipi_dsi.h     |   27 +
  4 files changed, 1095 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dw_mipi_dsi.c
  create mode 100644 include/drm/bridge/dw_mipi_dsi.h


+struct dw_mipi_dsi {
+	struct mipi_dsi_host dsi_host;
+	struct drm_connector connector;
+	struct drm_encoder *encoder;
struct drm_bridge already has a pointer to an encoder, can't you reuse
that instead?

+	struct drm_bridge *bridge;
Typically you'd embed the bridge into the driver structure.
I'm almost done with all the modifications according to your comments.
Remaining this point I can not understand, the dsi is a pointer of
drm_bridge,
hence I can not get the bridge by container_of.
Although, the "bridge->driver_private = dsi" have done in
dw_mipi_dsi_register.
I don't understand. If you don't make bridge a pointer, but rather embed
it within the structure, then you can use container_of(), can't you? You
get it allocated automatically as part of allocating the dw_mipi_dsi
structure. See for example the ps8622 and ptn3460 bridge drivers.
Yeah, got it, thanks. :)
I am going to modify it in next version patch.

On a slightly unrelated note, I'm not sure if we discussed this already
or if it was in another thread, but why is this even a bridge driver? A
bridge is typically some IC outside of the SoC, whereas this clearly is
IP designed into the SoC. So it's really more of an encoder rather than
a bridge.
I guess you mean this thread <https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5816991/>
I think the bridge is beneficial to share the dw-mipi driver for different soc
with same version dw-mipi IP.


Thierry





_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux