Thanks, Daniel. There sure are a lot of Daniels. > > + else if (obj->base.dma_buf && obj->base.dma_buf->resv->fence_excl) > > + return true; > > I'm not sure if this is really doing exactly what you want. > When a reservation object's exclusive fence has signaled, I think the > old pointer in fence_excl is not actually cleared; it keeps pointing > to the old exclusive fence until that replaced by another. > > So, just nake null-check here is like saying "did this reservation > object ever have an exclusive fence at some point in the past", which > is not necessarily the same as "is there an exclusive fence associated > with the buffer that I am about to flip"? > > The reservation object is a complicated rcu & ww_mutex protected > beast, so I would be shy to access any of its fields directly. Hm, well, the goal is to ensure that mmio_flip is used if we might need to wait on a fence, so if there are false positives it shouldn't be lethal. Nonetheless, you're probably right. Maybe it would be better to use !reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu(test_all=FALSE), which should be TRUE iff there is an unsignaled exclusive fence attached, meaning we might have to wait. > > if (mmio_flip->req) > > WARN_ON(__i915_wait_request(mmio_flip->req, > > @@ -11196,6 +11203,12 @@ static void intel_mmio_flip_work_func(struct work_struct *work) > > false, NULL, > > &mmio_flip->i915->rps.mmioflips)); > > > > + /* For framebuffer backed by dmabuf, wait for fence */ > > + if (obj->base.dma_buf) > > + WARN_ON(reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu(obj->base.dma_buf->resv, > > + false, false, > > + MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT) < 0); > > + > > Hmm, don't you want an interrupt-able wait here? > And if so, you probably don't want to WARN_ON() -ERESTARTSYS. I had this as an interruptable wait previously, but I'm not sure how we would actually handle an interrupt in that case. Notice also how __i915_wait_request(interruptable=FALSE) just above is also an uninterruptable wait. Thanks, Alex _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel