On 11/23/15 18:09, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:44:35PM +0200, Jyri Sarha wrote:
Add drm_atomic_helper_disable_planes_on_crtc() for disabling all
planes associated with the given CRTC. This can be used for instance
in the CRTC helper disable callback to disable all planes before
shutting down the display pipeline.
Signed-off-by: Jyri Sarha <jsarha@xxxxxx>
---
This a follow version to "[PATCH RFC] drm/crtc_helper: Add
drm_crtc_helper_disable_planes()"-patch [1], with Daniel Vetter's
review comments [2] implemented. Hope I got everything right this
time. Thanks a lot for the prompt review.
When resending a patch please add a revision log to remind reviewers of
what you changed. Otherwise they have to dig out the old thread again to
figure that out. E.g.
v2 per Daniel's feedback:
- Improve kerneldoc.
- WARN_ON when atomic_disable is missing.
- Also use crtc_funcs->atomic_begin/atomic_flush optionally.
I usually do that, but not when I drop RFC off, but I'll do it next time
even then.
Best regards,
Jyri
[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/dri-devel/msg94720.html
[2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/dri-devel/msg94722.html
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/drm/drm_atomic_helper.h | 2 ++
2 files changed, 54 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
index a53ed7a..229c810 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
@@ -1281,6 +1281,58 @@ void drm_atomic_helper_commit_planes(struct drm_device *dev,
EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_atomic_helper_commit_planes);
/**
+ * drm_atomic_helper_disable_planes_on_crtc - helper to disable CRTC's planes
+ * @crtc: CRTC
+ * @atomic: if set, synchronize with CRTC's atomic_begin/flush hooks
+ *
+ * Disables all planes associated with the given CRTC. This can be
+ * used for instance in the CRTC helper disable callback to disable
+ * all planes before shutting down the display pipeline.
+ *
+ * If there are planes to disable and the atomic-parameter is set the
+ * function calls the CRTC's atomic_begin hook before and atomic_flush
+ * hook after disabling the planes.
+ *
+ * It is a bug to call this function without having implemented the
+ * ->atomic_disable() plane hook.
+ */
+void drm_atomic_helper_disable_planes_on_crtc(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
+ bool atomic)
+{
+ const struct drm_crtc_helper_funcs *crtc_funcs =
+ crtc->helper_private;
+ struct drm_plane *plane;
+ bool flush = false;
+
+ if (!crtc_funcs || !crtc_funcs->atomic_begin)
+ atomic = false;
+
+ drm_for_each_plane(plane, crtc->dev) {
+ const struct drm_plane_helper_funcs *plane_funcs =
+ plane->helper_private;
+
+ if (plane->state->crtc != crtc || !plane_funcs)
+ continue;
+
+ if (atomic && !flush) {
+ crtc_funcs->atomic_begin(crtc, NULL);
+ flush = true;
I think it's clearer if you do that upfront with a simple
if (crtc_funcs->atomic_begin && atomic)
crtc_funcs->atomic_begin();
That would cause ->atomic_begin() and ->atomic_flush() cycle even when
there is no planes to disable. At least with omapdrm that causes a write
HW and crtc_disable() is called once at probe time when the piece of HW
not yet enabled.
I am not that familiar with either drm or omapdrm yet to tell if that is
wrong, but in any case, calling ->atomic_begin() and ->atomic_flush()
for nothing makes no sense to me.
Would you like it better if there would be two drm_for_each_plane()
loops, one for just checking if there is anything to do and the second
doing actual job and ->atomic_begin() there in between?
+ }
+
+ WARN_ON(!plane_funcs->atomic_disable);
+ if (plane_funcs->atomic_disable)
+ plane_funcs->atomic_disable(plane, NULL);
+ }
+
+ if (flush) {
+ WARN_ON(!crtc_funcs->atomic_flush);
+ if (crtc_funcs->atomic_flush)
+ crtc_funcs->atomic_flush(crtc, NULL);
+ }
Same here below. Imo the tracking you do in flush isn't required, since
drivers can opt to not implement either atomic_begin or atomic_flush (on
some hw you only need atomic_flush, and your code would break such a
driver here).
Ok, thanks I did not know that. I'll fix that.
In short the code flow for atomic_begin/flush should look exactly like in
drm_atomic_helper_commit_planes_on_crtc, except for the added && atomic
check.
Otherwise looks good.
Cheers, Daniel
Thanks,
Jyri
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_atomic_helper_disable_planes_on_crtc);
+
+/**
* drm_atomic_helper_commit_planes_on_crtc - commit plane state for a crtc
* @old_crtc_state: atomic state object with the old crtc state
*
diff --git a/include/drm/drm_atomic_helper.h b/include/drm/drm_atomic_helper.h
index 8cba54a..b7d4237 100644
--- a/include/drm/drm_atomic_helper.h
+++ b/include/drm/drm_atomic_helper.h
@@ -62,6 +62,8 @@ void drm_atomic_helper_commit_planes(struct drm_device *dev,
void drm_atomic_helper_cleanup_planes(struct drm_device *dev,
struct drm_atomic_state *old_state);
void drm_atomic_helper_commit_planes_on_crtc(struct drm_crtc_state *old_crtc_state);
+void drm_atomic_helper_disable_planes_on_crtc(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
+ bool atomic);
void drm_atomic_helper_swap_state(struct drm_device *dev,
struct drm_atomic_state *state);
--
1.9.1
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
