The only things this protects is reading ->flags and ->size, both of which are invariant over the lifetime of an exynos gem bo. So no locking needed at all (besides that, nothing protects the writers anyway). Aside: exynos_gem_obj->size is redundant with exynos_gem_obj->base.size and probably should be removed. Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_gem.c | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_gem.c index a3286a1ec2b1..dfb3bfee1b63 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_gem.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_gem.c @@ -352,12 +352,9 @@ int exynos_drm_gem_get_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_exynos_gem_info *args = data; struct drm_gem_object *obj; - mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex); - obj = drm_gem_object_lookup(dev, file_priv, args->handle); if (!obj) { DRM_ERROR("failed to lookup gem object.\n"); - mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex); return -EINVAL; } @@ -367,7 +364,6 @@ int exynos_drm_gem_get_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, args->size = exynos_gem->size; drm_gem_object_unreference(obj); - mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex); return 0; } -- 2.5.1 _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel