On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 05:48:32PM +0000, Daniel Stone wrote: > On 16 November 2015 at 17:43, Russell King - ARM Linux > <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 05:32:05PM +0000, Daniel Stone wrote: > >> On 16 November 2015 at 17:22, Russell King - ARM Linux > >> <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > Please sensibly wrap your messages. Your lines are longer than 80 > >> > characters which makes it exceedingly difficult for some people to reply > >> > to your very very very very very very very very very very very very > >> > very very very very very very very very very very very very very very > >> > very very very very very very very very very very very very very very > >> > very very very very very very very very very very very very very very > >> > very very very very very very very very very very very very very very > >> > very very very very very very long lines without first reformatting > >> > them manually - and why should they bother to reply if they have that > >> > kind of additional work? Thanks. > >> > >> His lines are wrapped mostly at 80, but sometimes at 86, characters. > >> You should probably look into fixing your MUA. > > > > No. > > > > Standard net etiquette is that email should be wrapped around 72 > > characters to give space for reply indentation to remain readable > > on an 80 column screen. Most of my email replies are written on an > > 80 column screen. > > Oh, I just thought there was > a greater reason for your > 660-character tantrum Sorry, I've stopped reading at this point, at the point where you start slinging crap around. If you have a serious point to make, maybe you could grow up in the next five minutes and write a proper email, thanks. -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net. _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
