On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 06:16:08PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Tuesday 20 October 2015 09:32:13 Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 01:51:54AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > The drm driver .load() operation is prone to race conditions as it
> > > initializes the driver after registering the device nodes. Its usage is
> > > deprecated, inline it in the probe function and call drm_dev_alloc() and
> > > drm_dev_register() explicitly.
> > >
> > > For consistency inline the .unload() handler in the remove function as
> > > well.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart
> > > <laurent.pinchart+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.c | 184 +++++++++++++-----------
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_hdmicon.c | 11 +-
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvdscon.c | 11 +-
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_vgacon.c | 11 +-
> > > 4 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 113 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.c index bebcc97db5e5..46d628752371
> > > 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.c
>
> [snip]
>
> > > -static int rcar_du_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > +static int rcar_du_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > {
> > > - struct rcar_du_device *rcdu = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > > + struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> > > + struct rcar_du_device *rcdu;
> > > + struct drm_connector *connector;
> > > + struct drm_device *ddev;
> > > + struct resource *mem;
> > > + int ret;
> > > +
> > > + if (np == NULL) {
> > > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no device tree node\n");
> > > + return -ENODEV;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + /* Allocate and initialize the DRM and R-Car device structures. */
> > > + rcdu = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*rcdu), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > + if (rcdu == NULL)
> > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > +
> > > + init_waitqueue_head(&rcdu->commit.wait);
> > >
> > > - drm_put_dev(rcdu->ddev);
> > > + rcdu->dev = &pdev->dev;
> > > + rcdu->info = of_match_device(rcar_du_of_table, rcdu->dev)->data;
> > > +
> > > + ddev = drm_dev_alloc(&rcar_du_driver, &pdev->dev);
> > > + if (!ddev)
> > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > +
> > > + rcdu->ddev = ddev;
> > > + ddev->dev_private = rcdu;
> > > +
> > > + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rcdu);
> > > +
> > > + /* I/O resources */
> > > + mem = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> > > + rcdu->mmio = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, mem);
> > > + if (IS_ERR(rcdu->mmio)) {
> > > + ret = PTR_ERR(rcdu->mmio);
> > > + goto error;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + /* Initialize vertical blanking interrupts handling. Start with
> vblank
> > > + * disabled for all CRTCs.
> > > + */
> > > + ret = drm_vblank_init(ddev, (1 << rcdu->info->num_crtcs) - 1);
> > > + if (ret < 0) {
> > > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to initialize vblank\n");
> > > + goto error;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + /* DRM/KMS objects */
> > > + ret = rcar_du_modeset_init(rcdu);
> > > + if (ret < 0) {
> > > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to initialize DRM/KMS (%d)\n", ret);
> > > + goto error;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + ddev->irq_enabled = 1;
> > > +
> > > + /* Register the DRM device with the core and the connectors with
> > > + * sysfs.
> > > + */
> > > + ret = drm_dev_register(ddev, 0);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + goto error;
> > > +
> > > + mutex_lock(&ddev->mode_config.mutex);
> > > + drm_for_each_connector(connector, ddev) {
> > > + ret = drm_connector_register(connector);
> > > + if (ret < 0)
> > > + break;
> > > + }
> > > + mutex_unlock(&ddev->mode_config.mutex);
> >
> > I'm wondereding whether we shouldn't just wrap this up in a helper somehow,
> > like drm_dev_modeset_register.
>
> How about drm_connector_plug_all() to match the existing
> drm_connector_unplug_all() ?
plug/unplug has for me a different meaning wrt connectors. And because of
the MST problem I'd just leave this along really.
> > Only trouble is that we might be racing with adding MST connectors already,
> > and that's where I stopped thinking about it ;-)
>
> You'll have to brief me on the MST issue if you want my opinion on the matter
> :-)
MST can hot-add connectors, and we can do that as soon as we process
hotplug events. Which is generally towards the end of the init sequence,
but decidedly before drm_dev_register().
So a function which walks all connectors (even when holding relevant
locks) could try to double-register a connector added through MST hotplug,
leading to slight unpleasantries.
But since this is hard I didn't think up an idea for how to address this.
Since there's also the question whether the hotplug uevent will fare well
before the drm_dev_register() call ...
-Daniel
>
> > Anyway that aside aside:
> >
> > Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks.
>
> > > +
> > > + if (ret < 0)
> > > + goto error;
> > > +
> > > + DRM_INFO("Device %s probed\n", dev_name(&pdev->dev));
> > >
> > > return 0;
> > > +
> > > +error:
> > > + rcar_du_remove(pdev);
> > > +
> > > + return ret;
> > >
> > > }
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Laurent Pinchart
>
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
