I can only guess that instead of testm/testn (which are either
uninitialized or have pre-determined values at the end of the preceding
loops) n and m were meant to be used by commit e829d7ef9f
("drm/mgag200: Add support for a new rev of G200e"). In any event the
compiler is right in warning that testm/testn are possibly uninitalized
at this point, i.e. some change is needed no matter what.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mathieu Larouche <mathieu.larouche@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_mode.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- 4.3-rc6/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_mode.c
+++ 4.3-rc6-mgag200-uninit/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_mode.c
@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ static int mga_g200se_set_plls(struct mg
}
}
- fvv = pllreffreq * testn / testm;
+ fvv = pllreffreq * n / m;
fvv = (fvv - 800000) / 50000;
if (fvv > 15)
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
